Payment processing fees explained: interchange, markups and total cost
Last updated 19 October 2026
Educational overview of how processing fees are typically built, plus an explicit note that this product does not collect prices.
Fee stack anatomy
Use this checklist when reading a tariff. Values stay “Not collected” here because Payment Market Radar does not store commercial schedules.
- Interchange
- Not collectedUsually tied to the card issuer under network rules
- Scheme / network assessments
- Not collectedNetwork charges beside interchange
- Acquirer or PSP markup
- Not collectedPercentage, fixed amount, or both
- FX and payout line items
- Not collectedConversion, payout speed, and related fees
- Platform minimums and extras
- Not collectedMonthly minimums, PCI, disputes, idle accounts
Why “the processing fee” is usually several fees
A card transaction typically incurs more than one charge. Networks, issuers, and the acquirer or PSP each take a component. Local payment methods (account-to-account, wallets, cash) use different schemes and often different commercial models. Mixing those into one percentage without saying so makes vendors hard to compare.
Interchange
For cards, interchange is commonly the amount associated with the issuing bank (the customer’s card issuer), set under network rules. It varies by country, card product, consumer vs commercial, and how the payment was authenticated (for example whether a 3-D Secure flow applied). Networks publish interchange documents; this radar does not mirror those files.
Scheme or network assessments
Card networks also charge their own assessments or scheme fees. These sit beside interchange. Exact names and schedules differ by region and are defined by each network.
Acquirer or PSP markup
The processor or acquirer adds its own margin — sometimes as a percentage, sometimes a fixed amount per transaction, often both. Gateway, tokenization, payout, or fraud tools may be billed separately. Markup is a commercial choice; it is not an interchange rate.
Blended vs interchange-plus (and similar)
Blended / flat pricing wraps several components into one rate. It is simple to read and opaque to audit.
Interchange-plus (and related IC+ / IC++) structures usually pass through network costs and add a disclosed markup. Whether that lowers your total cost depends on your card mix. This site does not compute that mix.
Total cost of payments
When you compare providers, ask for more than the headline rate:
- authorization vs captured vs refunded volumes
- chargebacks, retrievals, and dispute fees
- FX conversion if you settle in one currency and sell in others
- payout speed and payout fees for marketplaces or platforms
- monthly minimums, PCI, and idle-account fees
Those line items are still outside Payment Market Radar. Use provider profiles for documented capabilities and what to compare besides price, then request a tariff from each vendor.
What the radar is for instead
Capability changes — a new local method, a new processor integration, a newly documented API — often affect cost later (new schemes, new markets) but they are not prices. Track them on documented changes and on pairs such as the published comparisons.
Explore providers
- Stripe — Global PSP / payments platform
- Adyen — Enterprise PSP / acquiring
- Checkout.com — Global PSP / enterprise payments
- Worldpay — Enterprise acquiring / global payments
Related comparisons
Frequently asked questions
What is interchange?
Interchange is a fee typically paid toward the card-issuing side of a card transaction. It is set by card-network rules and varies by region, card product, and how the payment is authenticated. Exact rates are published by the networks, not by this radar.
Why doesn’t Payment Market Radar list processing fees?
The collector copies fee terms only from monitored public pages, and only the words and figures on those pages. Providers without a public fee page stay “not collected”. It does not invent a rate card or a personalised quote.
Is blended pricing the same as interchange-plus?
No. Blended (or flat) pricing wraps several cost components into one rate. Interchange-plus usually shows network costs plus a stated acquirer markup. Which is cheaper depends on your mix of cards and countries; it is not something this site calculates.
All guides